Who writes grant proposals?
PhD authors who have served as grant reviewers at NIH, NSF, ERC, Wellcome, NIHR. Many active researchers with their own funded grants.
Which funders do you cover?
US: NIH, NSF, DoD, DOE, CDC, USDA. UK: NIHR, MRC, BBSRC, ESRC, AHRC, EPSRC, NERC, Wellcome, Leverhulme. EU: ERC (Starting, Consolidator, Advanced, Synergy), Horizon Europe, Marie Curie. AU: ARC, NHMRC. CA: SSHRC, CIHR, NSERC.
How do you address NIH 5 criteria?
Significance, Investigators, Innovation, Approach, Environment. Each criterion addressed explicitly with reviewer language. Specific Aims page hook-engineered.
How do you handle NSF Broader Impacts?
Grounded in specific activities (mentoring, K-12 outreach, public engagement, curriculum, broadening participation), not vague aspirations. Department alignment letters drafted.
What is your success rate?
41.2% as of 2026 (most recent verified data) vs nationwide ~18% NIH and 20-25% NSF. Success depends on PI track record + science + writing quality. We control writing quality.
Do you write SBIR / STTR?
Yes. SBIR / STTR reauthorised through September 2031. Phase I and Phase II proposals. Department-specific (NIH, NSF, DoD).
Do you use AI?
No. Reviewers detect AI-generated grants (templated rationale, vague significance). Every grant human-written by PhD authors with reviewer experience.
How do I get a quote?
Use the calculator at the top, or share specific aims + funder + deadline. Quote in 30 seconds.